Forget Dak vs. Tony; question now in Dallas is Elliott vs. Dickerson

Ezekiel Elliott photo courtesy of the Dallas Cowboys/James D. Smith

By Clark Judge

Talk of Fame Network

The question in Dallas shouldn’t be Dak or Tony … not anymore it shouldn’t. Nope, the question in Dallas should be Ezekiel or Eric, and this one has nothing to do with starting.

And everything to do finishing.

I’m talking, of course, of rookie Ezekiel Elliott’s pursuit of Eric Dickerson’s NFL rookie record of 1,808 yards, a mark that has stood for 33 years. Prior to the season, Elliott said he planned on breaking it, and while that made for good copy it seemed his chances were something like … oh, say, the Raiders moving to Saskatchewan.


But look what’s happening now.

Where Elliott once seemed a longshot to squeeze Dickerson, now he’s very much in the picture. Granted, the odds are still long – he would have to average 110.5 yards per game over his last 11 starts – but Elliott is back on the radar. Reason: Despite a slow start, the guy averages 117.2 yards per game, meaning … meaning, he would finish with 1,874, breaking Dickerson’s mark.

But that’s not all. Over his last four games he not only became the first NFL rookie to rush for 130 or more yards in four consecutive games, but he’s averaging … averaging … 142.25 yards per start. Furthermore, his season high of 157 yards was achieved last weekend … against the league’s No.1-ranked run defense.

He has this weekend off, but his next thee games are against the Eagles, Browns and Pittsburgh – with the Steelers ranked 13th, the Eagles 18th and the Browns 27th vs. the run. Of the three, the Steelers allow the most yards per carry (4.8), while the Browns allow the fewest (4.0). What’s more, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia have also allowed five runs of 20 or more yards, tied for third-worst in the NFL behind San Francisco (9) and Houston (7).

So that makes Elliott’s improbable challenge a little more … well, probable.

When we had Dickerson on a Talk of Fame Network broadcast last month I asked him if thought Elliott could do what Barry Sanders, Curtis Martin, Terrell Davis, Adrian Peterson, you name it, could not the past three decades — and that’s eclipse his rookie rushing record.

Now, keep in mind, this was in the immediate aftermath of Elliott’s 51-yard effort vs. the Giants in Game One.

“Yes, I do,” Dickerson said. “This is the reason why: Starting the season off is no big deal. It happened to me. I mean I started off slow in ’84 when I had that 2,000-yard season. (And) my rookie season I started off with 91 yards and not a touchdown.

“They have a great offensive line over there in Dallas. Dak Prescott is a great quarterback. He has  a lot of upside and a lot of potential. (And) he can keep that eight-and-nine-man front off the line of scrimmage. But do I want him (Elliott) to break that record? No, I don’t.”

Understandable, and stay tuned.

Dak vs. Tony is no longer the issue in Dallas. Ezekiel vs. Eric is … and, considering how Elliott is playing, it should be. If nothing else, this is one decision we’re going to have to wait to play itself out.

(Ezekiel Elliott photos courtesy of the Dallas Cowboys)


Previous Giants' owner John Mara knows no grey area in Brown debacle
Next Despite numbers, Ellard and Neil Smith remain HOF "outsiders''


  1. Rasputin
    October 20, 2016

    Nice, but the goal is to win the Super Bowl, so it wouldn’t break my heart if they spelled him with Morris here and there to keep him strong later in the season and hopefully in the playoffs. The guy’s a workhorse though, so it wouldn’t surprise me if he is still strong late. His carries per game lead the league but are in line with where the leader usually is, so it’s not an exorbitant amount. He’s averaging a little fewer carries than what Murray had in 2014.

  2. […] “They have a great offensive line over there in Dallas,” Dickerson told Talk of Fame Network. […]

  3. […] “They have a great offensive line over there in Dallas,” Dickerson told Talk of Fame Network. […]

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.