Marshawn Lynch headed for Hall of Fame? Slow down, people


marshawnlynchone.

(Photos courtesy of the Seattle Seahawks)

(Now that Seattle has made it official and put Marshawn Lynch on the reserve/retired list, it once again has provoked the question: Is Marshawn Lynch Hall-of-Fame worthy? We answered that in February, shortly after Lynch announced his retirement and the Seahawks said nobody on their team would wear No. 24 again, but with people questioning his Hall-of-Fame credentials now we thought it worth re-posting … if, for no other reason, than to serve as a rebuttal).

By Clark Judge

Talk of Fame Network

Marshawn Lynch announced his retirement last weekend on Twitter … at least, we think he did … and since then I’ve heard from people asking if he’s going to the Hall of Fame. Answer: Not unless he has a ticket to get in.

Look, Lynch had a nice career and was a valuable member of Seattle teams that went to consecutive Super Bowls, but don’t tell me he’s on the Hall-of-Fame radar when former Seattle running backs Shaun Alexander and Ricky Watters are not.

They’re at least as qualified – if not more so – and neither can get a sniff. Not only has neither been a Hall-of-Fame finalist; neither has been a semifinalist, meaning they’re not among the final 25 players or coaches chosen annually for Hall-of-Fame consideration.

Now tell make that makes sense … because it doesn’t.

Watters ranks 23rd in career rushing, 23rd in all-time yards from scrimmage and was remarkably consistent – rushing for 1,000 yards seven times (including 1,000 for three different franchises) while catching 50 or more passes five times. He also scored three TDs in San Francisco’s 49-26 demolition of San Diego in Super Bowl XXIX.

Which leads me to my next point: He starred when games mattered most. In 11 playoff appearances he produced 1,117 yards in offense with 12 touchdowns – eight rushing and four receiving. You don’t have to be an Einstein to figure that works out to an average … an average … of something like 101 yards and one touchdown per games.

And, yeah, I like that.

Alexander didn’t rush for as many yards as Watters, but he was a two-time All-Pro, a league MVP, an Offensive Player of the Year, a single-season rushing leader and a member of an all-decade team (2000s). He’s also Seattle’s career touchdown leader with 112 and set the league’s single season TD record with 28 (later broken by LaDainian Tomlinson).

Yet now that Lynch comes along we’re supposed to move him to the front of the queue? I don’t think so.

He never led the league in rushing. He never was an MVP. He wasn’t an Offensive Player of the Year. He ranks 36th in career rushing, or below Alexander and Watters. And he was named to one All-Pro team.

But why confine this to the Seattle Seahawks? We can’t get Roger Craig into the Hall, for crying out loud, and tell me whom you’d rather have – Lynch or Craig? Craig had a season where he had 1,000 yards rushing AND 1,000 in receiving. Only one other, Hall-of-Famer Marshall Faulk, has been able to replicate that. Moreover, Craig was a Pro Bowler as a fullback AND running back, Offensive Player of the Year, member of the 1980s’ all-decade team and three-time Super Bowl champion.

Edgerrin James is on hold. So is Terrell Davis. Jamal Lewis has no momentum. Neither does Corey Dillon.

That’s not to diminish Marshawn Lynch’s accomplishments. From 2011-14 the guy led the league in carries, rushing touchdowns and rushing yards, was the focal point of Seattle’s offense and won a Super Bowl. But he ranks below Watters and Alexander in career rushing yards and has eight fewer career TDs than Watters and 29 fewer than Alexander.

I know, there’s the eye test, and “Beast Mode” was a load. But so was Watters. He was one of the greatest all-purpose backs I’ve seen – maybe the best since … well, since Craig. And, like Lynch, Alexander was the focal point of the Seahawks’ offense, rushing for 27 touchdowns in 2005 as Seattle went to its first Super Bowl. Plus, there’s this: During the five years he was Seattle’s go-to guy, he averaged 1,501 yards, 17 touchdowns, 4.5 yards per carry and 93.8 yards per game.

Impressive? Not to the Hall’s board of selectors. He can’t get on the short list to Canton. Neither can Watters or Craig. And, until they do, Marshawn Lynch won’t, either.

Previous Happy birthday, Johnny U.!
Next Jim Plunkett: Thank goodness Al Davis never granted me my wish

5 Comments

  1. February 13, 2016
    Reply

    …and most certainly not before twice Super Bowl-winning coach, Tom Flores! Just saying.

    • Tunjie
      February 16, 2016
      Reply

      I indeed like this guy’s constant dedication to Tom Flores, as I’ve seen him on multiple posts and I agree with you on Flores.

  2. bachslunch
    May 8, 2016
    Reply

    Agreed, don’t really get the HoF chatter in favor of Marshawn Lynch. He’s a fairly short career back who really has no better HoF argument than folks like Tiki Barber, Shaun Alexander, Clinton Portis, Ahman Green, Jamal Lewis, Thomas Jones, or Ricky Williams.

  3. Jeff
    May 10, 2016
    Reply

    Yeah – I’ve enjoyed watching the guy and think he had HOF potential, but not quite enough for me. particularly given the other backs with as good or better records (like all the names bachslunch mentioned….the only one there who I’d like to see get in the conversation is Barber, who had an impressive all-purpose career. Maybe Alexander).

    • May 11, 2016
      Reply

      You’re right, Jeff. The problem I have here is he’s not the best back who played for the Seahawks. Ricky Watters and/or Shaun Alexander are. And they can’t get a sniff. Before we start talking Lynch we should be talking about these guys. And there are plenty of others elsewhere — namely, guys like Roger Craig and Chuck Foreman, Larry Brown, Edgerrin James and Terrell Davis — who need to be discussed first.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.