NFL is worrying about the wrong flag controversy

Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Vladimir Putin would love today’s NFL. Nothing a Russian dictator likes to see more than a lot of flags unfurled while marshal law goes into effect.

That, in essence, is what the NFL has devolved into: A game where endless touchdowns are intermixed with endless penalty flags thrown to insure those touchdowns will keep coming. It’s like watching a pinball machine on permanent tilt.

The NFL is turning into a weekly weekend Flag Day celebration. Only problem is no one is celebrating those flags but quarterbacks now encased in bubble wrap courtesy of a competition committee gone mad.

In the first three weeks of this season, there have been 34 roughing-the-passer penalties. That’s more than twice as many as the same period last year, when only 16 were called. Four came in one game, the Monday night debacle between the Pittsburgh Steelers and Tampa Bay Buccaneers. It got to the point where defensive players were flagged for looking cross at the quarterback.

Even Steelers’ quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, the beneficiary of two of those calls, hinted that this has gotten ridiculous.

“There are sure a lot of them,” Roethlisberger said, “I can’t imagine the fans at home are enjoying it too much.”

They are not, which is why fewer and fewer people are watching at home. Or in the stands, as the Redskins found out when their seemingly endless streak of home sellouts came to an end earlier this year.

NFL owners fear the flag is hurting their product and irking their fans, and they are right. They just have the wrong flag problem.

It’s not a few players taking a knee during the National Anthem that’s the problem with the flag. It’s NFL officials taking defense out of the game by unfurling flag after flag that is making pro football unwatchable for some … and something best be done about it. In a hurry.

The league has made roughing-the-passer calls a point of emphasis this season, with much of the focus literally falling on a portion of Rule 12, Section 2, Article 13, which reads: “When tackling a passer who is in a defenseless posture (e.g., during or just after throwing a pass), a defensive player must not unnecessarily or violently throw him down and land on top of him with all or most of the defender’s weight. Instead, the defensive player must strive to wrap up or cradle the passer with the defensive player’s arms.”

Okay. Fine. No slamming Tom Brady into the ground or dumping Cam Newton head first into the turf. Understood. What is not understood, some members of the league’s competition committee privately concede, is how far to take that rule.

Officials, like lawyers, tend to err on the side of caution. Better we cover our ass when a quarterback’s on his ass than face the potential ire of the suits on Park Avenue who run the NFL even though most of them never tackled anything but a math problem.

When lawyers and P.R guys start writing the rules, or deciding which ones to emphasize, what you end up with is what the NFL has been the last three weeks: A soft but politically correct game that bears no resemblance to the one that made pro football a financial colossus.

What’s next? Everyone gets a Super Bowl trophy and equal playing time?

We are not advocating gratuitous violence here. We’re just asking how in the world is someone making a head on tackle not going to land on top of the guy he’s knocking backwards?

That is what Clay Matthews was flagged for three weeks in a row, leading him to raise a good point last Sunday.

“Obviously when you’re tackling a guy from the front, you’re going to land on him,’’ Matthews said after being flagged for doing just that to Redskins’ quarterback Alex Smith. “I understand the spirit of the rule. I said that [in] weeks prior. When you have a hit like that, that’s a football play. I even went up to Alex Smith after the game and asked him, ‘What do you think? What can I do differently?’

“Like I said last week, the NFL’s going to come back and say I put my body on him. But that’s a football play. I hit him from the front, got my head across, wrapped up. I’ve never heard of anybody tackling somebody without any hands.

“When he gives himself up as soon as you hit him, your body weight’s going to go on him. I think we’re looking for the hits that took (Packers’ quarterback) Aaron (Rodgers) out last year, that little extra (which resulted in Rodgers breaking his collarbone from a hit by Anthony Barr). If I wanted to hurt him, I could’ve.

“Unfortunately, this league is going in a direction I think a lot of people don’t like. I think they’re getting soft. The only thing hard about this league is the fines that they levy down on guys like me who play the game hard…I’ve been playing this game for over 20 years. That’s how you tackle.’’

Former head of officials and now FOX Sports rules analyst Mike Pereira agreed, telling the Talk of Fame Network this week, “I do not think this is what the competition committee intended. It’s out of hand, to me. The needle has moved too far.’’

Pereira added that an adjustment was quietly made on the use of the helmet rule that was added in the offseason after “they realized in the pre-season they had a debacle on their hands with helmet hits. They gave officials a green light to pass on making the call. I liked the backing off.’’

Pereira believes the same is about to happen on roughing the passer after a previously scheduled conference call with the competition committee occurs next week. Hopefully, he’s right because Flag Days have gotten to the point where the NFL needs to worry less about protecting their quarterbacks and more about protecting their game.

Pro football is a big money business, the most popular sport in America. It is also a collision sport, violent by its very nature. But attendance and viewership are now in decline, and it’s not because the country is going soft. It’s because pro football is. What is being done to change the nature of the game is a bigger part of waning interest than the suits realize.

In its effort to avoid lawsuits and liability claims, the NFL is mistakenly changing the basic nature of the sport. And please spare me all the talk about “player safety’’ because if that were the issue teams wouldn’t be shooting up players with pain killers every weekend so they can get back on the field when they’d be on medical leave at most other jobs.

Perhaps someone needs to remind the people who run the NFL these days of one thing: A lot of people play touch football but the only ones watching it are the parents of the players.

Previous Rick Gosselin's Week 3 NFL rankings: L.A. remains Ram tough
Next Mike Pereira: How NFL should change roughing calls on QBs


  1. Joseph Wright
    September 26, 2018

    My solution to many problems the league has been encountering like this the last several years is the same as it has been since this nonsense has started: Fire Roger Goddell.

    I find it ironic that Goddell is frustrated over the quality of the Pro Bowl the last several years. The quality of play has declined in the Pro Bowl because the defenses on both sides have stopped competing since about 2002.

    If Goddell (a former tight end in high school; no doubt a “receiving,” not “blocking” tight end; he can’t stand contact) continues to further handcuff the defenses, all games are going to look like the Pro Bowl. Taking away hitting in football is like taking away head and face punches in boxing. Taking away the essence of the sport is taking away the popularity of the sport.

  2. bachslunch
    September 29, 2018

    Football’s caught in a problematic bind. It’s by nature a violent sport, like boxing, and players can and do get hurt as part of the deal. But it’s bad for business having the NFLs marquee players (read QBs) get sidelined for extended periods, and the threat of lawsuits over such things as concussions is a major issue.

    Changes that somehow find a good balance between these things is difficult, and there’s not surprisingly a ways to go on this. But the right balance can indeed be found — it takes time, and sorting out the gray area in the middle is especially challenging. Getting rid of everything from tackling by grabbing the face mask to horsecollar tackles to head slaps to spearing hits with the helmet to the head and neck area were good things and have been pretty much successfully implemented. In an unrelated circumstance, problems with reviewing plays on the field took a good while to sort out but now seem to work well. Things like this can be accomplished, but it just takes time, tweaking, and patience.

    It’s also not surprising that some defensive players complain about the changes since they’re most affected. It’s hard to change the way one has always done things, and it’s frustrating — but sometimes it’s necessary. Of course, anything that keeps them playing longer is good for their satisfaction level and pocketbook, too.

    What’s the answer? I say keep evaluating and tinkering. Things like this can and will improve. It just takes time and patience.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.