Seniors, contributors battle for a HOF place in Canton


With the Pro Football Hall-of-Fame senior and contributor committees meeting this week in Canton, the Talk of Fame Network brings its listeners an insider’s view of the proceedings and the chances, both real and possible, of the men on those lists.

Co-hosts Ron Borges and Rick Gosselin serve on the senior committee, with Rick at Thursday’s nominating meeting of five of the nine committee members. Rick and co-host Clark Judge serve on the contributor’s committee, with Clark in Canton this Friday. Nowhere else will you get the kind of insight these three can give you into why certain fan favorites are unlikely to survive the process, while others emerge as this year’s nominees.

To get some perspective on one dark horse contributor’s candidacy, the guys visited with Hall-of-Fame linebacker Harry Carson. Carson was witness to … and participant in … the turnaround of the New York Giants under then-general manager George Young, who helped transform them from perennial losers into two-time Super Bowl winners and annual playoff contenders under Bill Parcells in the 1980s and early 1990s.

Carson had his contractual ups and downs negotiating with Young and admits that on the show. But he also argues forcefully that what Young accomplished in New York was as Hall-of-Fame worthy as the work of this year’s expected front runners: Former Redskins’ and Chargers’ GM Bobby Beathard, ex-Cowboys’ scout and personnel director Gil Brandt, Denver Broncos’ owner Pat Bowlen and Patriots’ owner Robert Kraft. In the end, Young reached the final thtree along with Bowlen and Beathard efore Beathard finally emerged as this year’ contributor candidate. Why dd Young get so far? Here’s Carson’s take.

“I certainly was never in the room when they were discussing draft picks and how to build the team, but he was the guy at the top,’’ Carson said of Young. “He changed the culture of the team. It wasn’t just Bill Parcells.’’

As proof, Carson cited not only the draft choices made after Young’s arrival in 1979 but also his decision to give Parcells a second chance as head coach after going 3-12-1 in his first season as reasons.

“George was willing to give Parcells another opportunity to do things his way,’’ Carson said. “Parcells righted the ship and made changes that needed to be made. Look at the personnel and who (Young) brought in. If someone in heaven asked George if he belonged in the Hall of Fame, he’d say he didn’t need it to validate him. But I think he does warrant great consideration.’’

Former Dallas Texan and Kansas City Chiefs’ linebacker Smokey Stover feels the same way about senior candidate Johnny Robinson. Robinson was a member of the AFL’s all-time team, is the AFL career leader in interceptions with 57 and led both the AFL (1966) and NFL (1970) in interceptions with 10 each of those seasons.

Robinson was also a starter on both of the Chiefs’ Super Bowl teams, including its Super Bowl IV winner that overwhelmed the Minnesota Vikings to cement the AFL’s stature as a co-equal with the more established NFL.

“Johnny was one of the smartest players I ever played with,’’ Stover said of Robinson, who is in ill-health back in Louisiana, where he remains a football legend both from his professional career and his All-America days at LSU. “He knew what was happening before it happened.’’

Stover agrees with many who believe a number of ex-AFL players were slighted by the Hall’s voters when representatives of the old guard NFL teams held a 12-8 voting edge over those representing the original AFL teams — an advantage that lasted until the post-merger expansion began to add new teams and new faces on the committee. The enmity between the established league and the AFL upstarts seemingly was passed on to at least some Hall-of-Fame voters in the early days of AFL eligibility for the Hall, and the proof seems to be right there in busts on display in Canton.

Only 12 of the 48 members of the all-time AFL team have been elected to the Hall of Fame, and, of those, only four of the 22 defensive players have been chosen. Was there a Hall-of-Fame conspiracy that held up Robinson’s rightful election for so long he faded from memory?

“I’d have to agree with you,’’ Stover said of the conspiracy theories. “The majority of guys I know who are up-to-date with football feel some of the earlier (AFL) players were held back … then time passes.’’

Yet time stood still Thursday for two former players when the senior committee brought out 11-time finalist Jerry Kramer and former All-Pro linebacker Robert Brazile. The guys go in depth into why Kramer, now 81, has been so long ignored despite having been selected as the only guard on the NFL’s 50th anniversary team.

Whether Robinson ever passes through the doors of Canton remains to be seen, but, if he does, you can bet Smokey Stover will be standing there watching. But if Robinson doesn’t, you’ll hear no whining from him.

“He has no qualms about the way it’s happened,’’ Stover says of Robinson. “You’ll never hear him cursing or stomping the ground (over his exclusion). Johnny was always a cool-headed guy. And back here in Louisiana, Johnny Robinson is a legend. Everyone knows Johnny Robinson.’’

The same can’t be said for former San Francisco 49ers’ defensive tackle Bryant Young. But many who do remember him as a player wonder why he’s never made it as a Hall-of-Fame semifinalist. Our guys visited with Young, who now coaches the Atlanta Falcons’ defensive line, to discuss his chances and the difficulties of being recognized when playing defensive tackle.

Young was a four-time All-Pro, a member of the 1990s’ all-decade team and the league’s Comeback Player of the Year in 1999. After suffering a devastating broken leg in 1998 that ended a season where he was leading all defensive tackles with 9 ½ sacks, Young faced a difficult rehab. He had a metal rod surgically inserted in his leg, yet came back the next year to record 11 sacks and a safety.

When Young retired, his 89.5 sacks were the fourth highest total amassed by a defensive tackle, trailing only Hall-of-Famers John Randle and Warren Sapp, as well as Denver’s Trevor Pryce.

Young doesn’t wonder why he isn’t in the Hall but is puzzled why his career hasn’t allowed him to at least advance to semi-final (top 25) status, a subject the Talk of Fame Network also finds surprising.

“It is a bit baffling,’’ Young said. “I look at the numbers and the span of my career, and it makes you wonder.’’

Young recalls his career, his nearly career-ending injury on a Monday Night game against the Giants and his battles with Cowboys’ Hall of Famer Larry Allen. He also explains the difference between playing and coaching his position and why defensive tackles like himself and first-time Hall of Fame nominee Richard Seymour have such a hard time being recognized at a position that has few statistics and demands unselfish play to be successful.

“When you’re doing your job, sometimes you’re the unsung hero doing the dirty work,’’ Young joked when asked about the defensive tackle’s lot in football life. “I once led the league in ‘almost sacks,’ if that’s a stat.’’

There’s all that, plus the two-minute drill and our guys handicapping the senior and contributor balloting. You can compare how they felt with the way things came out this week by tuning in to SB Nation Radio, downloading the free podcast at iTunes or the TuneIn app. You can also hear the show on our website, talkoffamenetworkcom.

Previous Brazile, Kramer HOF senior candidates for Class of 2018
Next Beathard named contributor candidate for Hall's 2018 class

7 Comments

  1. Rasputin
    August 25, 2017
    Reply

    It’s hilarious hearing Ron pretend Kaepernick has some ultra free speech right that tramples everyone else’s rights while in the same rant denying that lowly bakers have free speech. And Ron, I don’t hear about bakers refusing to serve gay people. I do hear about them getting into trouble for refusing to make PRODUCTS they don’t make or want to make. Constitutionally they have just as much right to not make a product they don’t make as you do. They’re not slaves. The Supreme Court will hopefully get that settled the right way so we don’t lose the First Amendment.

  2. Justin
    August 25, 2017
    Reply

    Rasputin: You are wrong on many, many levels. Someone who opens a business to the public CANNOT discriminate because of a customer’s race, gender, religion, and, yes, sexual orientation. It is the meaning of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.

    However, you certainly have the right to espouse your intolerant beliefs. That is your first amendment right. Interesting that you criticize Kaepernick for exercising his same right. In the end, history is always on the side of those who work for tolerance and equality for all. Kaepernick may be punished now, but just like Jackie Robinson, Muhammad Ali, Jim Brown, and others before him, he will be vindicated. I strongly doubt you will be.

    • Rasputin
      August 25, 2017
      Reply

      Nope, Justin, I’m right. In a free country people can’t be forced to make a product, like an explicitly gay themed cake, if they don’t want to. They’re not “intolerant” either. It’s a matter of conscience. They’re perfectly happy to sell gay people products that they do make, but this is a manufactured controversy by the truly intolerant people who want to stamp out any hint of dissent, social conservatism, or Christianity in society. That violates not just multiple portions of the First Amendment (including religious freedom) but the Ninth Amendment as well (general individual liberty). It’s disturbing that so many people today don’t understand the first thing about liberty. If those myopic Stalinist scumbags get their way we’ll all lose our freedom.

      This has nothing to do with the 14th Amendment, lol. There have been some terrible activist rulings lately, but I’m cautiously optimistic the Supreme Court will see it my way.

      Kaepernick has the right to not stand for the national anthem. He doesn’t have the right to force other people to employ him period, let alone if they decide that him not standing for the national anthem while at work in uniform is “conduct detrimental” to their business.

      I’m still waiting for Ron or maybe you to exhibit outrage over Dolphins LB Don Jones being fined, suspended, and sent to mandatory re-education counseling over an un-PC post on his own social media page on his own time. Hypocrisy.

      On substance, Kaepernick supporting an oppressive totalitarian regime in Castro’s Cuba underscores how vapid and meaningless his non-stand is. The guy is a moron. He’s certainly not standing for freedom or tolerance. For you to equate him with Jackie Robinson (LOL!) says more about you than anything else. Muhammad Ali and Jim Brown did say some stupid things over the years, but I wouldn’t necessarily lump all those guys together either. I hardly think history is on communism’s side as you seem to feel.

      • Rasputin
        August 25, 2017
        Reply

        Should clarify that it has nothing to do with the 14th Amendment in the sense Justin implied. It may in the sense that free speech and religious liberty apply to state citizens through the 14th Amendment though.

  3. Justin
    August 25, 2017
    Reply

    Rasputin: Just remember that your personal liberty ends at the tip of my metaphorical nose. I just hope that your employer, employees, colleagues, customers, and suppliers all share your myopic views because if they don’t you could find yourself in Kaepernick’s shoes sooner rather than later.

    Finally, I thought McCarthyism ended in the 1950s. People who believe in equal rights and treatment under the law are not Communists. They are patriots.

    • Rasputin
      August 25, 2017
      Reply

      I actually agree with your first paragraph, Justin, except that you’re projecting your own myopia. It’s the tip of the noses of the bakers and NFL owners we’re discussing here. The liberty of Kaepernick and gay couples does not include forcing these other people to do whatever they want on their behalf.

      “People who believe in equal rights and treatment under the law are not Communists. They are patriots.”

      Well….CASTRO was a communist, Justin. You know, the guy Kaepernick ignorantly praised while wearing a Fidel shirt right before playing at Miami of all places. They roundly booed him, and rightly so. LB Kiko Alonso, the son of Cuban refugees who had fled that island prison, made it clear he was extra fired up to play against Kaepernick. It was poetic justice that he got to make the hard hitting, game winning tackle against the clueless 49ers QB.

      And disrespecting the flag and anthem is as unpatriotic as a protest gets.

    • Rasputin
      August 25, 2017
      Reply

      Even the aforementioned Jim Brown disagrees with you.

      Jim Brown: “I’m going to give you the real deal: I’m an American. I don’t desecrate my flag and my national anthem. I’m not gonna do anything against the flag and national anthem. I’m going to work within those situations. But this is my country, and I’ll work out the problems, but I’ll do it in an intelligent manner.”

      He also said that Colin should make up his mind whether he’s an activist or a football player, because football is commercial, with owners and fans, and Kaepernick needs to honor that with the amount of money he’s been paid, and that it can come with employer rules and regulations. He said there are better, more effective ways to be an activist if you have a real cause than what Kaepernick is doing.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.